Typically the Star Wars Vs. Star Trek, Coke Vs. Pepsi arguments are childish and stupid and the Call of Duty Vs. Battlefield debate isn’t any different. Which is why instead of saying which one is better im just going to talk about the differences between the two very different games. Now there is plenty of information our about BF3 but only teasers for MW3 so I‘m just going to have to speculate (bullshit) the information about it. Battlefield was my first Online game and remains to be one of my favorites with its massive battles beautifully handled vehicles and the funniest helicopter crashes I have ever seen. The modern warfare series is probably the most controversial game inside the gaming community with the decision to not allow dedicated servers. But still remains the most played online game on the Xbox and Playstation. 

All we have to go on for either game right now is the story line. In Modern Warfare 3 its all out/balls out war. With everyone around the world preoccupied with their own battles, it’s a cluster-frak and it seems you’ll have your work cut out for you. Taking place in France, Germany, The U.K. America and much more. It is what some would call a “World War”. In Battlefield the area of fighting is reduced to the Iran/Iraq border where you fight PLA a rebel group bent on pushing there way into Iraq. While one is more blown up than the other both seem to give off an end-o-the word feeling. With earthquakes in Iraq to subs in the Manhattan Harbor. Until more information is released that’s about all I can see in my crystal ball. I’m sure once I snap out of the E3 coma I will be in I will get back to you with more. In the meantime stay tuned because there will be a lot more on the way.